Fifteen kilometres west of Midnapore, on the northern bank of the Kangsabati, lies one of Bengal's most unexpected and affecting heritage destinations. Pathra is a small village entirely defined by its temples: thirty-four of them, ranging from the eighteenth to the early nineteenth century, crowded along the riverbank and spilling back into the surrounding fields. Yet Pathra is almost unknown outside the state, and even within it is overshadowed by the more famous terracotta temples of Bishnupur. Pathra's temples have a character entirely their own: intimate, layered, half-wrapped in vegetation, built not by royal patronage but by a single merchant family and saved from oblivion by a single remarkable man.
History: From Gupta Hinterland to Temple Town
The history of Pathra reaches back well before the temples that now define it. From the eighth to the twelfth century CE, the village was an important node for Hindus, Jains and Buddhists, a natural inland halt for pilgrims and traders moving between Tamralipta port and the interior. A Vishnu-Lokeshvara statue excavated here in 1961, now preserved in the Ashutosh Museum in Kolkata, demonstrates the syncretic religious character of the site: the figure combines Buddhist and Hindu iconography in a single object. The turning point came in 1732, when Nawab Alivardi Khan appointed Bidyananda Ghoshal as revenue collector of Ratnachawk pargana. Bidyananda built temple after temple, transforming the village into a pilgrimage magnet.
The Man Who Saved Them: Yasin Pathan
The story of how these Hindu temples survived is inseparable from the story of Mohammed Yasin Pathan. He was seventeen years old in 1971 when he began his mission to save Pathra's temples, a Muslim man in a Muslim-minority region dedicating his life to restoring the religious heritage of another faith. He faced initial resistance from villagers and local powerbrokers, patiently building trust over years. He founded the Pathra Archaeological Preservation Committee in 1990, enlisted technical assistance from IIT Kharagpur's city planning department, and eventually persuaded the Archaeological Survey of India to take charge. By September 2003, the ASI had accepted formal responsibility for twenty-eight of the thirty-four temples and had repaired eighteen of them. Pathra's story: of a Muslim man protecting Hindu heritage over half a century has become a quietly celebrated example of interfaith guardianship.
The Temples
The temples fall into two natural groups. The first, along the main road and close to the Kangsabati riverbank, includes the grandest structure: the Navratna temple of the Majumdar family, a 250-year-old, forty-foot-high structure with nine towers and many terracotta panels on its walls. A small aat-chala (eight-sloped-roof) temple built in 1816 stands within the same compound. Opposite this complex is the Kalachand Temple, a rectangular flat-roofed structure with decorative pillars supporting five arched gateways in front, and behind it, three aat-chala Shiva mandirs and a pancharatna temple (five pinnacles), beyond which stands the roofless laterite Durga Mandapa.
Walk about two hundred metres off the main road to find the second, better-preserved group: three pancharatna temples with fine terracotta ornamentation, bearing images of Ram and Balaram, Radha and Krishna, the Dashavatar cycle, Hanuman, and Durga. Soldiers carrying guns are depicted at the entrance arches, a detail that marks the Mughal and early Company period of the temples' construction. The octagonal Rasmancha (built 1832), with its nine small towers, is particularly elegant. The Sitala Mandir (locally called Burimar Than) is the only deul-style temple at Pathra, its saptaratha shikhara (seven-projecting tower) topped by a round amalaka and kalasa, making it architecturally distinct from every other structure in the village. Several temples still have active Shivalingas worshipped daily by local families.
The materials are unusual: unlike the terracotta-dominant temples of Bishnupur, Pathra's artisans made extensive use of limestone stucco and seashell, materials associated with Mughal and transitional Indo-Islamic decorative traditions. The effect is softer and more fragile than baked terracotta, which partly explains the vulnerability of the temples to time and flood.
Comments